In the past few months, I’ve been parsing our house in
preparation for our move next summer. In
my rich experience with moving, especially moving without knowing how much
space you will have at your next destination, I’ve learned that sum of your
possessions has a direct correlation with the quantity of stress you will
experience in process. I’ve also learned
that the earlier you start preparations, the less hair pulling, stress eating
and general unpleasantness you incur during the actual event. You also don’t
have to worry about rewarding movers with a bottle of fine liquor for packing a
storage unit beyond their capacity guidelines (that is a story for another day).
My first project has been clearing out our closets. I chose
this task first because aside from books, it is the largest undertaking. Plus,
a consignment shop recently opened in our neighborhood giving me timely
motivation. I figured that consigning
clothes would give me the opportunity to generate money from spending money*
and to narrow down our personal belongings at the same time. It’s win-win all
around. I have a habit of seasonally weeding and donating clothes, but this is
the first full-scale review I’ve done since we moved into our house.
When I started to sort through my clothing, I decided that I
had to be unemotional. If something didn’t fit, if I hadn’t worn in in at least
a year, or if I had several things just like it, it had to go. I separated
every piece of clothing I owned into piles: keep, consign, donate, and
undecided. Some clothes went easily into the piles. Others foundered between
keep, consign and undecided.
I was reluctant to get rid of some of the items in the
undecided pile because even though I no longer wore them, they held a certain
place in my heart. The red skirt I wore the day Matt proposed still fit, but I
have only worn it a few times since. I reminded myself that there are several
photographs of me in it, so I finally decided that someone else might love it
like I did. Other pieces were not so easy. Just taking a picture would not do them
justice in my memory. I noticed that the ones that were the hardest to make
decisions about were decidedly tactile. Touching them instantly took me back in time and made my memories more vivid.
As I mulled these items over, I remembered an article about five
personal belongings you should preserve for memories. One of the contributors
posited that it was just as important to save some everyday clothes as it was
to keep special things like wedding dresses. This made me think about an
exhibit I visited years ago at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. It was
a chronology of British fashion, from work uniforms to coronation gowns that
spanned several centuries. It was fascinating timeline that I later used as
inspiration for decorating a 50th anniversary charity ball by asking
former patrons to borrow and exhibit their gowns representing different decades.
Why couldn’t I curate my own personal clothing timeline? It
certainly wouldn’t be as voluminous as the V&A exhibit, but what was the
harm in keeping a few carefully selected items to let me have the occasional
trip down memory lane? I decided that I would keep up to five everyday items
that I no longer wear and “induct” them into my permanent collection. Before
they could be included on this list, and not just put in the undecided section
in my closet, I would have to decide that they invoked special memories and
represented my sartorial tastes at a particular time in my life.
Tomorrow, in Part Two (since this entry has turned into
something much longer than I expected!), I’ll profile some of my choices. Who
knows, maybe I will decide to lampoon the J. Peterman catalog (have you ever experienced it? I haven't had a hard copy one in years, but the site is just as delightful).
*My husband and I have a long history of tongue-in-cheek
justification of our expenses starting with his assertion that buying a
PlayStation3 with BluRay was actually saving us money since we wouldn’t have to
buy a BluRay separately. We are fully aware this financial reasoning doesn’t
balance out.
No comments:
Post a Comment